DIFFERENCE BETWEEN JEWS AND MUSLIMS
The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000
ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION - or 20% of the world's population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1988 - Najib Mahfooz
Peace:
1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1994 - Yasser Arafat:
1990 - Elias James Corey
1999 - Ahmed Zewai
Economics: (zero)
Physics : (zero)
Medicine: 1960 -
Peter Brian Medawar
1998 - Ferid Mourad
TOTAL : 7 SEVEN ________________________________________________________________________
The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000
FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world's population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1910 - Paul Heyse
1927 - Henri Bergs
1958 - Boris Pasternak
1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 - Nelly Sachs
1976 - Saul Bellow
1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 - Elias Canetti
1987 - Joseph Brodsky
1991 - Nadine Gordimer World Peace:
1911 - Alfred Fried
1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 - Rene Cassin
1973 - Henry Kissinger
1978 - Menachem Begin
1986 - Elie Wiesel
1994 - Shimon Peres
1994 - Yitzhak Rabin
Physics:
1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 - Henri Moissan
1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
1910 - Otto Wallach
1915 - Richard Willstaetter
1918 - Fritz Haber
1921 - Albert Einstein
1922 - Niels Bohr
1925 - James Franck
1925 - Gustav Hertz
1943 - Gustav Stern
1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 - Felix Bloch
1954 - Max Born
1958 - Igor Tamm
1959 - Emilio Segre
1960 - Donald A. Glaser
1961 - Robert Hofstadter
1961 - Melvin Calvin
1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 - Julian Schwinger
1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
1971 - Dennis Gabor
1972 - William Howard Stein
1973 - Brian David Josephson
1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
1976 - Burton Richter
1977 - Ilya Prigogine
1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
1978 - Peter L Kapitza
1979 - Stephen Weinberg
1979 - Sheldon Glashow
1979 - Herbert Charle s Brown
1980 - Paul Berg
1980 - Walter Gilbert
1981 - Roald Hoffmann
1982 - Aaron Klug
1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
1985 - Jerome Karle
1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 - Robert Huber
1988 - Leon Lederman
1988 - Melvin Schwartz
1988 - Jack Steinberger
1989 - Sidney Altman
1990 - Jerome Friedman
1992 - Rudolph Marcus
1995 - Martin Perl
2000 - Alan J. Heeger
Economics:
1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 - Simon Kuznets
1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
1976 - Milton Friedman
1978 - Herbert A. Simon
1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 - Franco Modigliani
1987 - Robert M. Solow
1990 - Harry Markowitz
1990 - Merton Miller
1992 - Gary Becker
1993 - Robert Fogel
Medicine:
1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
1908 - Paul Erlich
1914 - Robert Barany
1922 - Otto Meyerhof
1930 - Karl Landsteiner
1931 - Otto Warburg
1936 - Otto Loewi
1944 - Joseph Erlanger
1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
1952 - Selman Abra ham Waksman
1953 - Hans Krebs
1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 - Joshua Lederberg
1959 - Arthur Kornberg
1964 - Konrad Bloch
1965 - Francois Jacob
1965 - Andre Lwoff
1967 - George Wald
1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 - Salvador Luria
1970 - Julius Axelrod
1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelm an
1975 - Howard Martin Temin
1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 - Daniel Nathans
1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
1984 - Cesar Milstein
1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
1985 - Joseph L.. Goldstein
1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 - Gertrude Elion
1989 - Harold Varmus
1991 - Erwin Neher
1991 - Bert Sakmann
1993 - Richard J. Roberts
1993 - Phillip Sharp
1994 - Alfred Gilman
1995 - Edward B. Lewis
TOTAL: 129 ONE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE !
The Jews are not promoting brain washing the children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims!
The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics or blow themselves up in German restaurants. There is not a single Jew that has destroyed a church. There is not a single Jew that protests by killing people. The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems. Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before they demand that humankind respects them!!
Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more culpability on Israel's part, the following two sentences really say it all:
'If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no moreviolence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be nomore Israel.' (Benjamin Netanyahu)
EXTRACTED FROM AN EMAIL - This seems pretty much interesting.
I am siding neither sides, I just want to share facts which I find interesting and enjoy my life.
9.21pm 17 January 2009
WELCOME TO E-REVOLUTION
Friday, 16 January 2009
Tuesday, 13 January 2009
WAR....
It is actually a BLASTING new year having blast at ****. I would like to step one side for now not because I am a supporter of war for the fun of it but I am giving it to you for reasons which I hope its sensible and logical enough for your kind understanding.
War is of course a destructive method being applied by certain group of people for them to gain power over the other. Letting us think back to day 1 of the war between both parties. Who is at fault? Who spark up the fight?
Closing in to Christmas, a rocket was launched by one of the country. But did anyone say anything about it? How can the world be so one sided? Fair or not its up to individual judgement. But right or wrong for the culprit at hand can be seen clearly.
Of course, when you are bullied you will tend to show your fangs ( if you have one ). So that is called retaliation which I personally do not see any wrong in this. So, what is all the hustle about. We are getting free service of terrorist eradication. Shouldn't all of us support "War On Terrorism" rather than complaining all sorts of bull shit. In my context, it is very clear that terrorist are those that threatens to destroy something or try to destroy something or perhaps destroyed something in the FIRST place. Warning citizens of the world that they will send rocket to each country isn't such a supporting statement by rocket sender.
In this case, in the economy turndown, we shall support war as more destruction will lead to better economy cycle leading to higher demand on goods which is a good thing to reactivate the economy of the world. Destructions will need replacements. Having such wonderful war going on, we should sit back enjoy with our wine watching the "fireworks". Suffering is part of life. Might as well they just deal with the toughness of life.
Apart from that, killing 1000 people isn't enough. Killing all is the real number to be targetted. That is just an opinion. Hiding in prayer's halls, schools, hospitals and within civillians are just part of their plan to enable the world to be simply misguided by the poor news reporters who failed to interprete the real meaning or reason for attacking those civillian places. As for me, I do agree. Wiping up the women and children will be the best choice as well. Simply because they are the weaker ones doesn't mean there is no chance that they are part of the terrorist activity. Growing up following the foot step of the "leaders" will just create more chaos. Exterminating the entire race of people might be the right choice. But that is just my opinion.
It is unfair to put the blame on the stronger party as failure to understand the power of the big, and try to provoke them is one wrong step to do. Failure to do so = death without mercy.
As for me, force will be reacted with force. Just in the opposite direction. There is a sure point by the Nobel Prize Winner I believe.
Conclusion, I am not supporter of war and I am not siding any side. It is best for peace but if peace cannot be found in their vocabulary, the best choice to do once and for all - the demolition.
9.34pm 13 January 2009
War is of course a destructive method being applied by certain group of people for them to gain power over the other. Letting us think back to day 1 of the war between both parties. Who is at fault? Who spark up the fight?
Closing in to Christmas, a rocket was launched by one of the country. But did anyone say anything about it? How can the world be so one sided? Fair or not its up to individual judgement. But right or wrong for the culprit at hand can be seen clearly.
Of course, when you are bullied you will tend to show your fangs ( if you have one ). So that is called retaliation which I personally do not see any wrong in this. So, what is all the hustle about. We are getting free service of terrorist eradication. Shouldn't all of us support "War On Terrorism" rather than complaining all sorts of bull shit. In my context, it is very clear that terrorist are those that threatens to destroy something or try to destroy something or perhaps destroyed something in the FIRST place. Warning citizens of the world that they will send rocket to each country isn't such a supporting statement by rocket sender.
In this case, in the economy turndown, we shall support war as more destruction will lead to better economy cycle leading to higher demand on goods which is a good thing to reactivate the economy of the world. Destructions will need replacements. Having such wonderful war going on, we should sit back enjoy with our wine watching the "fireworks". Suffering is part of life. Might as well they just deal with the toughness of life.
Apart from that, killing 1000 people isn't enough. Killing all is the real number to be targetted. That is just an opinion. Hiding in prayer's halls, schools, hospitals and within civillians are just part of their plan to enable the world to be simply misguided by the poor news reporters who failed to interprete the real meaning or reason for attacking those civillian places. As for me, I do agree. Wiping up the women and children will be the best choice as well. Simply because they are the weaker ones doesn't mean there is no chance that they are part of the terrorist activity. Growing up following the foot step of the "leaders" will just create more chaos. Exterminating the entire race of people might be the right choice. But that is just my opinion.
It is unfair to put the blame on the stronger party as failure to understand the power of the big, and try to provoke them is one wrong step to do. Failure to do so = death without mercy.
As for me, force will be reacted with force. Just in the opposite direction. There is a sure point by the Nobel Prize Winner I believe.
Conclusion, I am not supporter of war and I am not siding any side. It is best for peace but if peace cannot be found in their vocabulary, the best choice to do once and for all - the demolition.
9.34pm 13 January 2009
Thursday, 1 January 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
