WAR....

It is actually a BLASTING new year having blast at ****. I would like to step one side for now not because I am a supporter of war for the fun of it but I am giving it to you for reasons which I hope its sensible and logical enough for your kind understanding.

War is of course a destructive method being applied by certain group of people for them to gain power over the other. Letting us think back to day 1 of the war between both parties. Who is at fault? Who spark up the fight?

Closing in to Christmas, a rocket was launched by one of the country. But did anyone say anything about it? How can the world be so one sided? Fair or not its up to individual judgement. But right or wrong for the culprit at hand can be seen clearly.

Of course, when you are bullied you will tend to show your fangs ( if you have one ). So that is called retaliation which I personally do not see any wrong in this. So, what is all the hustle about. We are getting free service of terrorist eradication. Shouldn't all of us support "War On Terrorism" rather than complaining all sorts of bull shit. In my context, it is very clear that terrorist are those that threatens to destroy something or try to destroy something or perhaps destroyed something in the FIRST place. Warning citizens of the world that they will send rocket to each country isn't such a supporting statement by rocket sender.

In this case, in the economy turndown, we shall support war as more destruction will lead to better economy cycle leading to higher demand on goods which is a good thing to reactivate the economy of the world. Destructions will need replacements. Having such wonderful war going on, we should sit back enjoy with our wine watching the "fireworks". Suffering is part of life. Might as well they just deal with the toughness of life.

Apart from that, killing 1000 people isn't enough. Killing all is the real number to be targetted. That is just an opinion. Hiding in prayer's halls, schools, hospitals and within civillians are just part of their plan to enable the world to be simply misguided by the poor news reporters who failed to interprete the real meaning or reason for attacking those civillian places. As for me, I do agree. Wiping up the women and children will be the best choice as well. Simply because they are the weaker ones doesn't mean there is no chance that they are part of the terrorist activity. Growing up following the foot step of the "leaders" will just create more chaos. Exterminating the entire race of people might be the right choice. But that is just my opinion.

It is unfair to put the blame on the stronger party as failure to understand the power of the big, and try to provoke them is one wrong step to do. Failure to do so = death without mercy.

As for me, force will be reacted with force. Just in the opposite direction. There is a sure point by the Nobel Prize Winner I believe.

Conclusion, I am not supporter of war and I am not siding any side. It is best for peace but if peace cannot be found in their vocabulary, the best choice to do once and for all - the demolition.

9.34pm 13 January 2009